AI pair programming that actually watches your screen
Autocomplete finishes your line. A pair holds the problem with you — the failing test, the three hypotheses you already ruled out, the refactor you're circling. LivePair is the second kind.
It sees what you see
The copilot watches your editor, terminal, and browser — the stack trace scrolling past, the file you just opened, the test that just went red. 'Why is this failing?' works because it can see the failure, not because you described it well.
No pasting code into a chat window, no re-explaining the project layout. The context is the session itself.
It remembers the session
Pairing falls apart when your partner forgets what you tried. The agent keeps session state — hypotheses ruled out, changes made, where it's still uncertain — so a two-hour debugging session stays coherent instead of repeating suggestions from minute twenty.
A rubber duck that answers back
Half the value of pairing is saying the problem out loud. LivePair listens to the narration and pushes back — the edge case in your plan, the assumption you stated without noticing. It's the duck, except it talks.
What it costs
Agent chat runs on prepaid credits from $5 — metered per token, so a debugging question costs a fraction of a cent. Long pairing blocks run as live work sessions, 60–300 minutes at $3/hour (desktop or Android — iOS Safari runs camera-only sessions in beta). Pricing · sign up.